shashka: icon credit <user name="roflskate"> unless otherwise indicated (Default)
Адамска ☭ Revolver "Shalashaska" Ocelot ([personal profile] shashka) wrote2017-09-26 07:31 pm

[community profile] elnysa | overflow


overflow «


[personal profile] fiendennor 2017-12-17 02:57 am (UTC)(link)
[She reads Old Draconic, okay!] I suppose...

...I've always preferred doing it by hand to digital mediums, personally, but beggars can't be choosers.

[personal profile] fiendennor 2017-12-17 03:19 am (UTC)(link)
No, not in the slightest. An image is an image, as far as this is concerned.

I just prefer the tactile sense of writing it myself. But a photograph will suffice. [She steps away from the inscription so he can take a clear picture.]
fiendennor: (15)

[personal profile] fiendennor 2017-12-17 07:21 pm (UTC)(link)
Oh? Have you found them unreasonably superstitious, then? [She crosses her arms in thought.]

...if that can be the correct term when dealing with magic, at least.

[personal profile] fiendennor 2017-12-17 07:36 pm (UTC)(link)
I'm not familiar with it, no. [Though, hang on.] --you're saying that an animal was capable of "possessing" someone? Or was it just mimicking the symptoms?
fiendennor: (07)

[personal profile] fiendennor 2017-12-17 07:59 pm (UTC)(link)
Indistinguishable, perhaps, but that does not make them the same thing.

Where I come from, technology and magic have coexisted, but it is only recently that the former has been able to replicate what may be done by the latter. An airplane and an enchanted flying carpet may both fly, but that does not mean they are doing the same thing.
fiendennor: (15)

[personal profile] fiendennor 2017-12-27 07:35 pm (UTC)(link)
...why would you consider psychic energy not magic?

[personal profile] fiendennor 2017-12-28 05:17 am (UTC)(link)
And the distinction is?

To be honest, it seems like a completely arbitrary line to me.

[personal profile] fiendennor 2017-12-29 04:55 am (UTC)(link)
[Diana frowns.] I think you have it backwards.

The phrase says that advanced technology might be mistaken for magic. To one from five hundred years ago, an airplane and a flying carpet might seem to be doing the exact same thing.

It doesn't say that all magic is really science. The carpet and the airplane are doing different things.

[personal profile] fiendennor 2018-01-03 04:56 am (UTC)(link)
[Okay, hang on. She turns more to face him.] What's the difference, in your eyes? I'm not seeing the rather arbitrary distinction you mean to be making. Whether you call the force holding the carpet aloft psychic energy or magic energy, it's still acting outside the laws of commonly understood physics.

What would something have to do, in your mind, to be truly considered "magic"?